"Terror is theatre...Theatre's a con trick. Do you know what that means? Con trick? You've been deceived." -- John Le Carre', The Little Drummer Girl, 1983 (written with support from Mossad officers and a former head of Israeli military intelligence.)
Modern Israel is a terrorist nation and has been since its inception. The Likud Party, over which Benjamin Netanyahu currently presides, and the Israel Defense Forces (IDF), both sprang forth from the underground Zionist terror groups Irgun, Lehi and Haganah, who bombed and butchered Israel into existence in 1948. It was Israeli leaders like Menachem Begin who understood and perfected the science of terrorism as a tool for realizing political aims. Decades after his Irgun gang's 1946 bombing of the King David Hotel (which killed 91 people), and their 1948 slaughter of 254 peaceful villagers at Deir Yassin (half of whom were women and children), Begin would proudly admit to British journalist Russell Warren Howe that he was indeed the father of world terrorism. (Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, March 2009.)
Israel's legendary use of false-flag terrorism remains an enigma to the American mind. Even 23 years after 9/11, many Americans still can't come to grips with how terrorism is used as a form of international statecraft for which mainstream media spectators and their easily manipulated emotions are the real targets. Mass terror incidents are almost always used to justify pre-planned political agendas that would be wildly unpopular amongst the public absent some highly-charged emotional event. The Jewish-controlled western media plays its role by blasting out the version of events the State wishes to be believed while more often than not failing to do any proper reporting until long after the dust has settled, regardless of how many glaring inconsistencies exist in the government's narrative.
This is largely how our geopolitical world is formed.
Last month I wrote an article titled 'October 7th In Context' which detailed several anomalies in the official story of Hamas's attack on Israel in the fall of 2023. Among these were reports of IDF soldiers having had advance warnings of the attack that were ignored by their superiors, as well as evidence suggesting Israel's military invoked its controversial Hannibal Directive, resulting in the deaths of many Israeli civilians erroneously blamed on Hamas.
In the past week alone a handful of stories have appeared in the media corroborating these assertions.
The first story was published on June 13 by Britain's The Telegraph. Carrying the provocative heading, "Israel killed own citizens on October 7 in 'Hannibal Directive', UN claims" the article cites a recent United Nations report by the UN Independent Commission of Inquiry (COI) documenting Israel's implementation of the Hannibal Directive on October 7: 'The report by the UN commission investigating the attack on Israel and the subsequent war in Gaza documented "strong indications" that the "Hannibal Directive" was used in several instances that day, "harming Israelis at the same time as striking Palestinian militants."'
Although the report lowballed the estimated number of Israeli civilians killed by the IDF -- "at least 14" -- it was a significant expose', contradicting, as it did, the Israeli government's official line and being disseminated in a widely-read media outlet. The UN report confirms admissions by Israeli soldiers involved in the events of October 7th, such as Colonel Nof Erez, who told Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz (Nov. 15, 2023) the IDF employed "mass Hannibal" to prevent the capture of Israeli hostages.
The same day the Telegraph article appeared, the Jerusalem Post ran a story making it clear that Israel possessed precise foreknowledge of the impending Hamas attack weeks before October 7th.
Titled 'IDF knew of Hamas's plan to kidnap 250 before October 7 attack,' the article states: 'A newly surfaced document has revealed that the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) and intelligence systems had detailed knowledge of Hamas's plan to raid Israel and kidnap 250 people weeks before the October 7 massacre...The document, titled "Detailed End-to-End Raid Training," was distributed on September 19, 2023, and described in detail the series of exercises conducted by Hamas's elite units. These exercises included raiding military posts and kibbutzim...kidnapping soldiers and civilians, and maintaining the hostages once they were in the Gaza Strip. The report by Kan News stated, "Security sources told Kan News that the document was known to the intelligence leadership, at the very least in the Gaza Division."'
The article goes on: 'The report further detailed that Israeli intelligence officials monitored the exercise and documented the steps Hamas planned to take after breaching Israeli territory and taking over military posts. The expected number of hostages, according to the document, was between 200 and 250 people.'
So let's get this straight: IDF officials were aware of Hamas's impending attack; had been monitoring its military preparations, which included capturing almost the exact number of hostages that would eventually be taken; published its findings in an internal report distributed two weeks before October 7th; and the attack still somehow went off without a hitch?! How is that even possible?
Who can possibly believe the narrative that Israel was somehow caught off-guard when these kinds of revelations are emerging from the Israeli press? Anyone who has read Ronen Bergman's 2018 best-selling book Rise and Kill First: The Secret History of Israel's Targeted Assassinations knows just how penetrating Israel's intelligence gathering network is, especially in the Occupied Territories. Is it really possible to believe all systems failed allowing such an elementary attack to succeed?
Perhaps not coincidentally, two days after the report was publicized it was announced that Israel's top court would be suspending its investigation into the October 7 attack, an investigation that was looking into the major security/intelligence failures that occurred ahead of Hamas's unprecedented military operation. According to an article published by the Jewish News Syndicate (June 17, 2024): 'Israel's Supreme Court...issued an interim order on Sunday instructing State Comptroller Matanyahu Englman to suspend any parts of a probe into the failings of Oct. 7 that deal with the Israel Defense Forces and Israel Security Agency. Justice Gila Canfy-Steinitz wrote that the decision was made after reviewing classified documents submitted by security agencies. "In view of the complex security reality, the planned scope of the investigation, which will deal, among other things, with the combat support system and core operational issues...I order the suspension of the investigation procedures in everything that relates to the IDF and ISA,' she stated in her ruling, according to Ynet."'
Don't worry folks, I'm sure the decision to suspend the investigation has nothing to do with the report of Israeli foreknowledge making media headlines around the world. Don't be ridiculous!
In view of all the evidence now available in the public domain the conclusion is inescapable that Israel at the very least allowed the October 7 attack to happen to drum up unconditional support for their war agenda in the Middle East and to squelch the burgeoning opposition to Netanyahu's criminal regime taking place inside of Israel. Both of these aims have thus far been achieved. Terrorism is the stock and trade of the Likud coalition and has been since Menachem Begin founded the Party in 1973 by consolidating Zionist terror groups into his newly minted political movement. I strongly suggest the reason for Donald Trump's recent surge in popularity among many establishment insiders like the Jewish hedge fund manager Bill Ackman, is his ability to mobilize and energize his base into supporting more wars for Israel, whereas no military-aged American male is going to rally around a listless Biden/Harris presidency. Perhaps therein lies the reason Donald Trump was recently awarded $100 million in campaign contributions from Sheldon Adelson's widow, Miriam Adelson. If his previous four years in the Oval Office taught us anything it's this: when the Adelsons say jump, Trump asks "how high?"
*Read my debut book 'Perfidy of Zion' to learn much more. Copies can be obtained by emailing me at PerfidyofZionbook@gmail.com or by visiting www.truthblitzkrieg.com*
