The Perpetual Pandemic

A Pandemic of Cases

In 2009, just prior to the ‘Swine Flu’ outbreak, the World Health Organization (WHO) changed the definition of what constitutes a pandemic by eliminating “enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses” as a necessary criteria. Since then, as we’ve seen, a “pandemic” can be declared solely on numbers of cases. [1]

What we have experienced these past two years is in no way a pandemic under the traditional definition of the word. Instead, we have been treated to a pandemic of cases made possible by notoriously faulty tests — with the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) being the most widely used. [2]

The PCR test was created by Dr. Kary Mullis who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 for its invention. Mullis himself would say that PCR should never be used to diagnose infectious disease because it can easily be manipulated to “find anything in anyone.” He went on to say, “It [the PCR test] doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with was really going to hurt you…” (Though Kary Mullis died in August 2019, his assessment of the test’s shortcomings was proven to be true in August 2021, when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admitted it was incapable of distinguishing COVID from other viral illnesses.)

According to Mullis, what PCR was originally designed to do is take bits of genetic material found inside the body and amplify the sample collected so it could be analyzed for purposes of research. It was never intended to be used as a test for infectious disease simply because by amplifying the sample with higher cycle thresholds (CT), the likelihood of false positives is off the charts. And that’s exactly what has happened. [3]

Beyond the Threshold

It is widely understood that running a PCR test at 35 CT or higher will not yield accurate results because at that point the sample has been amplified to such an extent that the test is just picking up dead virus matter or inconsequential genetic fragments and reporting it as a positive test. For this reason Dr. Mullis said that “PCR is…just a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something.”

A September 28, 2020 study in Clinical Infectious Diseases, explained that when a PCR test is run at a cycle threshold (CT) of 35 or higher, the accuracy falls to just 3%! Even the slimy swamp-dwelling eel, Anthony Fauci, admitted during a radio interview that the chances of getting an accurate PCR reading over 35 CT “are miniscule” because at these levels a positive result is “just dead nucleotides, period.”

Yet up until just recently the CDC and FDA recommended running PCR at 40 CT and the WHO recommended running it at 45 CT! This made it possible for the WHO to declare a global ‘pandemic’ under the new contrived definition of the term.

This continued throughout 2020, as the amplification rates of the tests were deliberately run sky high so as to create the cases necessary to justify lockdowns and the deletion of human freedom. However, once the ‘vaccines’ arrived, the cycle thresholds were suddenly lowered to give the appearance that the jabs were working.

On January 20, 2021, after discussions with the CDC, the World Health Organization recommended that laboratories lower their testing amplification rates. Health writer Dr. David Samadi, commented that the WHO had made its decision because the previously high cycle thresholds were “resulting in any particle being declared a positive case” and reports in the media began pointing out that case numbers may have been ‘dramatically inflated.’

In April of 2021, with the ‘vaccine’ rollout in full swing, the CDC issued new guidance to laboratories in America to run PCR at 28 cycles, but only for vaccinated individuals! Unvaccinated samples were to continue being run at 40 CT or more, and so the likelihood of unvaccinated people testing positive compared with those who’ve taken the jab is intentionally designed to be disproportionate.

Illustrating the ruse, a lab in Massachusetts found that 85% – 90% of people who tested positive before the cycle threshold was lowered would now produce a negative result at 30 CT. Ashish Jha, MD director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, said: “I’m really shocked that it could be that high…Boy, does it really change the way we need to be thinking about testing.” It sure does. This manner of manipulation and deceit has provided the ‘justification’ for destroying our world. Not exactly a small issue. [4]

Died of ‘COVID’?

“The ‘Covid Pandemic’ was the creation of the PCR test run at high cycles designed to produce high rates of false positives. This allowed the medical establishment to designate almost all deaths from cancer, heart attack, etc. as “Covid deaths” if the patients were given the orchestrated PCR test run at cycles known to produce false positives. A person who died with a false positive was counted as a Covid death.” — Paul Craig Roberts, fmr. Asst. Secretary of the Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal.

In the spring of 2020, after what we were told was an unthinkably lethal COVID outbreak, Italian authorities revealed that 99% of those alleged to have died from COVID in Italy actually had multiple co-morbidities which alone could have been responsible for their deaths. [5] A little while later the CDC published a similar figure for America, claiming only 6% of COVID deaths occurred in fully healthy individuals, while the other 94% had an average of 3.8 potentially fatal co-morbidities. Clearly something fishy was going on and it had to do with the fraudulent manner in which ‘COVID deaths’ were being recorded. One example of this was if someone died from anything within 28 days of a positive test (in some countries it was 60 days), doctors were instructed to list the cause of death as ‘COVID.’

Dr. Scott Jensen, a medical doctor and former Minnesota state senator, said he was sent a seven-page document by the U.S. Department of Health ‘coaching’ him on the new way to fill out death certificates. He said that doctors were ‘encouraged, if not pressured’ into listing COVID as the cause of death — even in the absence of a positive test — if the person had any of the endless symptoms assigned to ‘COVID’ (runny nose, itchy eyes, common cold, etc.).

Illinois Public Health Director, Dr. Ngozi Ezike, revealed the mendacity at a news conference when she said, “If you were in hospice and given a few weeks to live and you were then found to have COVID, that would be counted as a COVID death. [There might be] a clear alternative cause, but it’s still listed as a COVID death. So everyone listed as a COVID death doesn’t mean that was the cause of death, but that they had COVID at the time of death.”

Is it any surprise we have repeatedly seen victims of gunshot wounds, auto accidents and terminal illnesses being counted as ‘COVID deaths’?

Long Planned

“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and proud of it.” — David Rockefeller, Memoirs, (2002) p. 405

None of this is happening by random chance. The destruction of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for billions of people has all been coldly calculated at the highest levels by forces that seek to own the entirety of Earth’s natural resources and material wealth. The trail of the perps can be traced back many years, but for obvious space constraints I will pick up the story with a document published just over a decade ago.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation produced a report titled ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.’ The elite Rockefeller family has been working for many years towards the establishment of a World Government and have been instrumental in founding organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, World Health Organization and the Trilateral Group, which all work tirelessly towards that goal. [6]

In the 2010 document, the Rockefeller Foundation ‘imagined’ the outbreak of an influenza virus and detailed the global response that would involve destruction of economies, closed shops and businesses, mandated face masks and temperature checks to enter communal spaces. The document said:

“During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems…leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.

At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in ways they saw fit.

In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.”

This prescient document also foretold the role China would play in setting the example for world-wide lockdowns: “However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.”

All of this has obviously come to pass.

The reason there was such global uniformity in the implementation of draconian and unscientific ‘health measures’ is because this event has been long-planned and centrally coordinated by the global elite who operate without consideration for national borders.

Another proof of this was an October, 2019 pandemic ‘simulation’ called Event 201, which involved the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the WHO and CDC, Johns Hopkins University, United Nations, Johnson & Johnson, and officials from China and the international banking system.

Event 201 centered around a coronavirus outbreak and game-planned government response strategies including lockdowns, censorship of alternative information and social media posts critical of the ‘pandemic,’ and the creation and mass distribution of a vaccine. Every participant in the Event 201 ‘simulation’ would go on to play integral roles in the unfolding drama only a couple short months later. If anyone still believes this to be a coincidence after all we’ve been through, they are bereft of mind.

And so friends, as we hurtle past year two of ’15 days to flatten the curve’ I would like you to stop for a moment and think about the extraordinary lies we have been told every step of this journey by people in positions of power. It does no good to continue ‘trusting the experts’ that have already guided us down the paths of social and economic devastation, and who, if left unchecked, will destroy every vestige of freedom we have left. Nor can we comply our way out of this situation. What is needed now is massive non-cooperation. We must simply refuse to cooperate with a system that seeks to enslave us and our future generations by obliterating the freedoms that once made this country a light unto the world. Stand your ground. Resist. Don’t ever capitulate to tyranny.

Notes:

1.) In November 2020, the WHO changed the time-honored definition of herd immunity by excising “immunity developed through previous infection.” The updated definition refers only to obtaining a certain vaccination threshold as a means for achieving herd immunity. Speaking of vaccines, the WHO also changed the definition of ‘vaccine’ from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” This subtle but important change was done to account for the COVID mRNA shots not actually providing immunity from contracting or transmitting ‘the virus.’

2.) PCR isn’t the only test that churns out a majority of false positives. In an email leaked to the press dated April 9, 2021, Ben Dyson, Executive Director of Strategy at UK Department of Health and an advisor to UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock, estimated that the lateral flow rapid test has at best a 25% chance of being accurate, and could be as low as 2%. This is the same test widely used in schools and businesses.

3.) In August 2021, the CDC admitted that PCR can’t distinguish between ‘COVID’ and other viral illnesses.

4.) A person is not considered fully vaccinated until 14 days after their second dose of the Pfizer or Moderna shots or their first dose of J&J. This means that if someone has an adverse reaction and dies after taking the first jab or within 14 days of taking the second one, it goes on the books as an ‘unvaccinated death, oftentimes with the cause being listed as ‘Covid-19.’

5.) In November 2021, the Italian Institute of Health quietly revised the COVID death-toll from 130,468 to just 3,783. Despite such a drastic reduction by a country that was used to generate the initial panic necessary to justify lockdowns in the West, the media in America has been completely silent on the change.

6.) The large piece of land in New York upon which the UN Headquarters building sits was donated by the Rockefeller family. The UN is a ‘stalking horse’ for World Government.

A Closer Look at the COVID Vaccine Rollout: Part II

“The strongest principle of growth lies in human choice.” – George Eliot

Recently I’ve been studying how the mRNA ‘vaccines’ actually work and I’ve made a point of sharing my insights with friends. Unfortunately my enthusiastic conveyances often fall on deaf ears, and not infrequently I find myself confronted with two glazed over orbs staring back at me with sheer indifference. You might think people would want to know how something works before being injected with it, but that isn’t the case with your average drone.

Now I don’t mean to brag here, and I know this will sound shocking, but it’s true…I have the same medical qualifications as Bill Gates [pauses for dramatic effect]. That is to say, I am not a doctor and have no medical training whatsoever. But if he can travel the world masquerading as one, surely it’s within my rights to share a few things I have learned along my road of inquiry and investigation.

A Novel Technology

“RNA vaccines and the technology they use are entirely experimental….What in the world could possibly go wrong?” – Jon Rappoport

As most people have probably heard by now, the vaccines produced by Pfizer and Moderna employ a messenger RNA (mRNA) technology never before used in vaccines. As opposed to injecting the patient with a weakened or dead virus, these ‘vaccines’ inject mRNA molecules into the body which are supposed to trigger an immune response creating antibodies.

In order for mRNA molecules to reach their destination once injected, they need to bypass the body’s natural defenses. To do this, drug manufacturers wrap them in a protective coating of polyethylene glycol-laced lipid nanoparticles. (Polyethylene glycol, a main component of antifreeze, is known to cause anaphylaxis, but never mind that.)

The first attempt Moderna made in creating an mRNA vaccine was for Crigler-Najjar syndrome in 2016 and they failed spectacularly. During animal trials the scientists discovered that the lipid nanoparticles were difficult to control and were causing many different problems. If the dose was too small, there wasn’t enough enzyme to affect the disease; and if the dose was too large, the drug was too toxic for the patient. Ultimately Moderna failed to find the right balance even though Crigler-Najjar syndrome was chosen for the trial specifically because it required the least amount of additional proteins and was therefore considered much easier to treat than say….a coronavirus.

Are Vaccines Amplifying the Virus?

Numerous news reports have come out recently indicating that the majority of people getting seriously ill or dying from COVID-19 have been vaccinated. As shocking as this might seem to the mind-bombed consumers of MSM propaganda, it shouldn’t be surprising to those familiar with previous coronavirus vaccine trials.

In his book The Truth About COVID-19, best-selling author Dr. Joseph Mercola, writes: “A frequent problem found in those studies was antibody-dependent immune enhancement — something we’ve known about since the 1960’s. In a nutshell, this is when a viral vaccine renders you more prone to severe disease and death if subsequently you are infected with the virus.”

Dr. Mercola cites a study published in the International Journal of Clinical Practice (Oct. 28, 2020) which states: “COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralizing antibodies may sensitize vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated.”

This should be a major concern for anyone who has received the Moderna, Pfizer or AstraZeneca jabs since preventing infection wasn’t even a criterion for receiving a passing grade in their clinical trial analysis. Yes you read that right. The vaccines received a passing grade even if their success rate in preventing infection was zero.  (AstraZeneca even began mass-producing their ‘vaccine’ without waiting for the clinical results!) 

In an article for Forbes magazine (Sept. 23, 2020), William Haseltine wrote: “We all expect an effective vaccine to prevent serious illness if infected. Three of the vaccine protocols — Moderna, Pfizer, and AstraZeneca — do not require that their vaccine prevent serious disease only that they prevent moderate symptoms which may be as mild as cough, or headache.”

When the bought-and-paid-for stooges of the Pharma cartel assure us that these radical new ‘treatments’ are safe and effective, they do so without any understanding (officially) of the various long-term effects they could have on people with diverse medical conditions. In addition, they say very little about how this novel technology will interact with live viruses, and they usually ignore the fact that the ‘vaccines’ don’t even protect against the disease.

Neutralizing or Binding?

There are two types of antibodies that can be produced by mRNA vaccines. ‘Neutralizing antibodies’ are good and will fight off the disease, while ‘binding antibodies’ can create problems by opening up “pathways” for the disease to travel through. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. explained the difference during an interview in May 2020:

“Coronavirus vaccine development began after three SARS epidemics had broken out, starting in early 2002. The Chinese, the Americans, the Europeans all got together and said, “We need to develop a vaccine against coronavirus.” Around 2012, they had about 30 vaccines that looked promising. They took the four best of those and manufactured the vaccines. They gave those vaccines to ferrets, which are the closest analogy when you’re looking at lung infections in human beings. The ferrets had an extraordinarily good antibody response, and that is the metric by which FDA licenses vaccines. So they thought, “We hit the jackpot.” All four of these vaccines worked like a charm. Then something terrible happened. Those ferrets were then exposed to the wild virus, developed inflammation in all their organs, their lungs stopped functioning. The scientists remembered that the same thing had happened in the 1960’s when they tried to develop an RSV vaccine, which is an upper respiratory illness very similar to coronavirus. At the time, they did not test it on animals. They went right to human testing. They tested it on about 35 children, and the same thing happened. The children developed a champion antibody response, robust, durable. It looked perfect, and then the children were exposed to the wild virus and they all became sick. Two of them died…Those scientists in 2012 remembered that, so they looked closer and they realized that there are two kinds of antibodies being produced by the coronavirus. There are neutralizing antibodies, which are the kind you want, which fight the disease, and then there are binding antibodies. The binding antibodies actually create a pathway for the disease in your body, and they trigger something called a paradoxical immune response or paradoxical immune enhancement. What that means is that it looks good until you get the disease, and then it makes the disease much, much worse.”

What might happen to people who have been treated with mRNA when flu season rolls around? Could a flu shot which injects ‘inactivated’ influenza negatively interact with it? [1] What do we make of the fact that an early Moderna press release showed that in 25 of 45 participants, only a binding antibody was produced? As we’ve already seen, mRNA does not function as a typical vaccine, rather it instructs your cells to produce the SARS-COV-2 spike protein with the idea being that your body will produce antibodies in response. But if your body produces binding antibodies as opposed to neutralizing antibodies, what will the effects be when your body encounters the wild virus? And furthermore, how can this antibody-producing ‘factory’ be shut down when it’s not needed? These are important questions that precious few in the mainstream seem to be asking.

“Go on, Take a Bite of the Apple…It’s Goood for You!”

I know many people who have received the Pfizer or Moderna shots despite having personal reservations about them. The pressure to comply is simply enormous and thinly-veiled threats directed at ‘anti-vaxxers’ continue to pour forth from “elected“ officials. (Just this week the Biden Administration announced ‘outreach teams’ will be going door-to-door in an attempt to get more people vaccinated; while Establishment lackey Dr. Paul Offit stated, “There is the vaccinated America and the unvaccinated America, and I think the unvaccinated America is about to pay a price for that.”)

Regardless of the fact that these things still haven’t been officially approved by the FDA (not that it really matters, see Vioxx and so many others), all manner of dirty tricks are continuously employed to coerce us into rolling up our sleeves and taking the jab. Weren’t we always taught to ignore peer-pressure and eschew bribes? Not anymore. Like so many of our traditional mores, these teachings have been consigned to the trash heap of history.

Now Million dollar lotteries, free pizza, ice cream, french fries and booze are offered in return for our unquestioning compliance. It reminds me of the guy offering free candy in the back of a van you were always cautioned to avoid as a child. You have to wonder why they are trying so hard to stampede us into taking something that a majority of us simply don’t need and that could cause serious harm.

Just some of the possible side effects listed by the FDA are: anaphylactic reactions; chronic seizures and convulsions; paralysis and Bell’s palsy; Guillain-Barre Syndrome; blood clots; strokes; myocarditis, and multisystem inflammatory syndrome. Meanwhile, a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine shows just how devastating these things can be for pregnant woman, despite assurances from ‘the authorities’ that they’re safe.

If that’s not enough, according to the CDC’s own Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) — which is estimated to only report anywhere from 1% – 10% of adverse events — there have already been more injuries and deaths from the experimental COVID vaccines than from all vaccines combined over the last 30 years, including a shocking number of young people. As I write the CDC is investigating the death of a 13 year-old boy in Michigan who died after receiving a COVID-19 vaccine. Similar stories have cropped up all over the world. Yet the Establishment continues its forward march with blindfolds on and their fingers in their ears pretending that none of it is happening, while stigmatizing anyone claiming otherwise as a science-hating ‘conspiracy theorist.’

Conclusion

“Anyone who has bought into the hype that all of these government lockdowns, a ruined economy, suppression of our liberties and a total disruption of our way of life are for the purpose of saving lives has drunk some serious Kool-Aid.” – Pastor Chuck Baldwin, 2008 Presidential candidate

It seems to me that the entire media-induced hysteria surrounding COVID-19 was, from the beginning, about getting people to take the vaccine. As Muammar Gaddafi astutely observed, “Capitalist countries produce viruses so that they can generate and sell vaccinations.”

By using a test (PCR) which doesn’t prove if someone is actually sick and running it at cycles many times higher than what’s appropriate, our technocratic overlords were able to create a pandemic based not on deaths or actual infections, but solely on cases. [2]

A September 28, 2020 study in Clinical Infectious Diseases, explained that when a PCR test is run at a cycle threshold (CT) of 35 or higher, the accuracy falls to just 3% (97% false positives for those scoring at home) because at that point genetic material is being amplified so greatly that the test will often pick up dead or inactive virus matter and report it as a positive test. For this reason the test’s creator, the late Nobel Laureate Kary Mullis, said it should never be used to test for infectious disease because it can easily be manipulated to “find anything in anyone.”

Even the incredibly corrupt Anthony Fauci admitted that the chances of getting an accurate PCR result over 35 CT “are miniscule.” Yet up until just recently the WHO recommended running PCR at 45 CT and the CDC and FDA recommended running it at 40 CT. Why would they do that? Couple this legerdemain with the suppression of effective treatments like Ivermectin and HCQ, dishonest death certificates listing COVID as the primary cause of death for anyone testing positive regardless of what really killed them, and the re-designation of the flu and other illnesses as COVID and it’s easy to see how a pandemic was created and foisted upon us.

I agree with Dr. Peter McCullough, Professor of Medicine and Vice Chief of Internal Medicine at Baylor University Medical Center, when he says that “the whole pandemic from the beginning was about the vaccine.” Massive profits are being reaped and the Globalist Elite have made considerable strides in the construction of their prized totalitarian surveillance state, made possible by the manufactured pandemic. What a racket. [3]

People would do well to pause and reflect on just how greatly we’ve been deceived this past year-and-a-half before rolling up their sleeve. And keep in mind, this is only the beginning. They’re coming after our children with this thing next.

Notes:

1.) According to a study titled ‘Influenza Vaccination and Respiratory Virus Interference Among Department of Defense Personnel During the 2017 – 2018 Influenza Season’ published in the journal Vaccine (Jan. 10, 2020): “Receiving influenza vaccination may increase the risk of other respiratory viruses, a phenomenon known as virus interference.” Commenting on this study, Dr. Joseph Mercola [The Truth About COVID-19] points out that: “Those who had received a seasonal flu shot were 36 percent more likely to contract coronavirus infection and 51 percent more likely to contract hMPV [human metapneumovirus] infection than unvaccinated individuals.”

2.) Just prior to the Swine Flu ‘Pandemic’ of 2009, the World Health Organization changed the definition of what constitutes a pandemic by eliminating “enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses” as a necessary criteria. Since then, as we've seen, a ”pandemic” can be declared solely on numbers of cases. More recently, in November 2020, they changed the time-honored definition of herd immunity by excising “immunity developed through previous infection.” The updated definition refers only to obtaining a certain vaccination threshold as a means for achieving herd immunity.

3.) Statistics for the year 2020 show no significant increase in mortality compared with other years. This fact was acknowledged by Johns Hopkins University in November 2020, when the institution published an article stating: “Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19….Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.” The study has since been taken down but a PDF of it can be read here.

Talmudism: A Blight on the Nations

"Bombs rain down from the sky

Gazan people know they'll die

The serpent's head consumes its tail

Her children at the wall they wail

In triumph of the land they stole

From those who're deemed bereft of soul"

With Israel's most recent terror campaign against the people of Gaza still fresh in our minds, and considering the defense of her murderous actions by large swaths of the 'Christian Right,' I feel compelled to highlight some data proving just how schizophrenic such a fellowship really is.  I'll start by exposing the sub-human status ascribed to non-Jews -- and especially Christians -- within the Orthodox religion, in the hope that it might help bring current events into sharper focus.  

Judeo-Christian Tradition?

"Let us not forget that Rabbinical Judaism is the declared and implacable enemy of Christianity." - Nesta Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movements (1924)

The Talmud is the primary religious text of Orthodox Judaism and supersedes the Old Testament by a large margin in the rabbinic world. [1]  It existed as an oral tradition all the way back to the time of Christ and was committed to writing over the first six centuries A.D.  Jesus himself denounced the Pharisaic oral law that would comprise the Talmud multiple times throughout the Gospels. In fact, it is the Talmud, not the Old Testament, that religious Jews are referring to when they speak of 'the Torah' -- aka the Torah SheBe'al peh.  The Old Testament is known as the Torah SheBitch'tav and takes a distant backseat to the importance placed on Talmud.

The Talmud (Teaching) is divided into two sections: the Mishnah (instruction) and Gemara (completion).  In a 1952 article for Look magazine titled 'What is a Jew?', Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer explains the significance of the Talmud: "The Babylonian Talmud is the legal code which forms the basis of Jewish religious law, and it is the textbook used in the training of Rabbis."

Famous Jewish historian, Professor Heinrich Graetz, was one of the first to write a comprehensive history of the Jewish people. In his 1893 opus History of the Jews, he states that the Talmud is "the fundamental possession of the Jewish race, its life breath, its very soul...nature and mankind, powers and events...for the Jewish nation...the only true reality was the Talmud."

But one man's treasure is another man's trash, and the Talmud has caused many problems for the Jews amongst the nations in which they've dwelt ever since its contents were made public to the Gentile world in the 13th century by a Jewish convert to Christianity named Nicholas Donin.  Donin's translations of Talmud passages ignited a literal flame of indignation which led to pogroms and Talmud burnings throughout Europe lasting for centuries.  Apparently our non-Jewish ancestors didn't appreciate being considered sub-human and liable to be cheated, murdered and raped with impunity by Judaics. [2]  Here are just a few passages which illustrate the sub-human status afforded non-Jews within Talmudic Judaism:

"If a gentile kills a Jew, the gentile is to be killed. But if a Jew kills a gentile, the Jew is to go free." (Sanhedrin 57a)

"A non-Jew is not considered a neighbor." (Sanhedrin 52b)

"All gentile children are animals." (Yebamoth 98a)

"Murdering of Goyim is permissible." (Kethuboth 102b)

"The goyim are not humans, they are beasts." (Baba Mezia 114b)

"All gentile woman are 'Niddah, Shifchah, Goyyah and Zonah' (menstrual filth, slaves, heathens and prostitutes). (Sanhedrin 81b - 82a)

"Christians are allied with hell, and Christianity is worse than incest." (Avodah Zarah 17a)

"When the Messiah comes, he will destroy the Christians." (Sanhedrin 99a)

A Religion of Humanitarianism and Brotherly Love?

"...it is important to keep in mind that until a few generations ago, almost all European Jews were deeply Orthodox...Highly distinctive cultural patterns and social attitudes can easily seep into a wider population, especially one that remains ignorant of the origin of those sentiments..." - Ron Unz, Jewish writer

The degree to which the racist supremacist Talmud instructs Jewish behavior in our times has been displayed by many illustrious figures of the international Jewish community through their own words.  Below are a just few examples:

* On Feb. 25, 1994, a Jewish physician and Israeli Army officer named Baruch Goldstein walked into a mosque in Hebron armed with an assault rifle and slaughtered 40 Palestinians while they knelt in prayer.  An additional 150 people were wounded in the onslaught.  Goldstein was beaten to death while attempting to reload his weapon and became a martyr to many of the Orthodox in Israel.  He was eulogized at his funeral by numerous notable rabbis, including Rabbi Yaacov Perrin who declared "One million Arabs are not worth a Jewish fingernail."  A book was written to commemorate Goldstein's deed called Baruch Hagever (The Blessed One) and pilgrimages are made to his grave.  Goldstein was a disciple of Meir Kahane, who once told Mike Wallace of CBS News that his teaching that Arabs are "dogs" is derived "from the Talmud."

* During a weekly Saturday night sermon in 2010, Rabbi Ovadia Yosef, the chief Sephardic Rabbi of Israel, stated: "Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that they have no place in the world - only to serve the People of Israel...Why are Gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat...that is why Gentiles were created."

* In an interview with Jewish Week (April 26, 1996), Yitzhak Ginsburg, a leading rabbi of the influential Chabad Lubavitch sect, gave an example to illustrate the disparity between Jews and Gentiles: "If a Jew needs a liver, can you take the liver of an innocent non-Jew passing by to save him? The Torah would probably permit that. Jewish life has an infinite value. There is something infinitely more holy and unique about Jewish life than non-Jewish life."

* In a 2011 interview with Orthodox station Radio Kol Hai, Rabbi Yitzak Shapira, author of Torat Hamelech, a book about killing Gentiles, stated: "When you read Jewish law (Talmud), in many places you might understand that gentiles can be killed freely without any problems."

It should be noted that these quotes are not just the insane ramblings of obscure nobodies; rather, they emanate forth from the highest echelons of Jewish political and religious life.  Rabbi Shapira was once even referred to by Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu as a "posek gadol - a great halakhic arbiter," forcing Israeli newspaper Ha'aretz (Apr. 23, 2013) to admonish that: "No other Western leader could be caught doing something comparable, even if he wanted to.  No one in the West publishes books on 'the laws of killing Jews,' or on the 'laws of killing non-Christians,' or on the 'laws of killing non-whites.'  They would be marched straight to prison, and anyone saluting them as 'great arbiters' would be booted out of public service."  [Technically speaking, Netanyahu was correct in his assessment, as Jewish law (halakha) is almost exclusively based on the Talmud and cognate rabbinic texts, almost all of which regard non-Jews as 'supernal refuse.']

A Religion of Self-Worship

"It is a fact the Jewish religion is above all Jewish nationalism." -- Moses Hess, teacher of Karl Marx and the founder of Zionism -- Rome and Jerusalem (1862)

The Orthodox are not alone in their institutionalized contempt for Gentiles -- the Talmudic mentality permeates secular Jewish life as well.  This is because the Talmud isn't so much a religious text of spiritual doctrines and eternal commands as it is a codification of materialism, greed and virulent ethnocentrism.  In other words, Talmudism is the racist supremacist mentality of Zionism adorned with a few purloined religious trappings necessary to complete the masquerade.  Jewish scholars Israel Shahak and Norton Mezvinsky highlight this fact in their book Jewish Fundamentalism in Israel: 

"Secular...Israeli Jews hold political views and engage in rhetoric similar to that of religious Jews...For religious Jews, the blood of non-Jews has no intrinsic value; for Likud (political party of Begin, Shamir and Netanyahu) it has limited value...Most foreign observers do not realize that a sizeable segment of the Israeli Jewish public hold these chauvinistic views...The worldview of Likud politicians, enthusiastically supported by followers, is basically the worldview of religious Jews; it has undergone significant secularization but has kept its essential qualities." [3]

The reason that secular Zionists and Orthodox rabbis have such a remarkably similar worldview is because they both view the Jewish nation itself as god and see the material world as being their sole domain.  In his invaluable 1,100 page work, Judaism Discovered, Talmud expert Michael Hoffman states: "The religion of Judaism has as its god, not Yahweh, but the Judaic people themselves, whose self-worship is at the center of the Talmud and rabbinic halacha."  Thus, when secular leader Benjamin Netanyahu recently proclaimed that Israel, a country with 2 million Arab inhabitants, is "the national state, not of all its citizens, but only of the Jewish people" he was espousing the very same ethnocentrism found in the Talmud and held by many rabbis. [4]

The Policy of Din Rodef

"The halacha is crystal clear.  It is entirely legitimate to kill a rodef...Babylonian Talmud, tractate Sanhedrin, folio 73a...It seems clear to me from a commonsense reading of this passage that the concept of a rodef encompasses those who advocate or incite the murder of Jews.  Every Gazan citizen who voted for Hamas must - surely - come within this category...I am not the slightest bit interested - as a practitioner of religious Judaism - in the development of a Christian position on 'proportionality'...The halachic position here could not be clearer, could it?" - Jewish professor Geoffrey Alderman, Guardian newspaper (Jan. 12, 2009).

The Talmud decrees that anyone who is considered a threat to the Jewish nation can be designated as a rodef (a pursuer) and is liable to be killed.  There is no trial, no examination of evidence, no questioning of witnesses and certainly no jury of one's peers.  Once some unfortunate is declared a rodef, it becomes open season on him or her.  This teaching, whether tacitly understood or directly enforced, has decided the fate of many people through the ages who were guilty of nothing more than standing up to Jewish power.  A famous example of this policy made operational was the murder of Swedish nobleman and diplomat, Count Folke Bernadotte.

Bernadotte was the son of Swedish Prince Oscar Bernadotte, the Count of Wisborg. During WW2 he was responsible for negotiating the release of 31,000 prisoners from German concentration camps, many of which were Jews.  After the war he was appointed United Nations Mediator in Palestine and was instrumental in putting an end to the violence of the 1948 Arab-Israeli War (a one-sided bloodbath which included the massacre at Deir Yassin). [5]  Despite his stellar record of emancipating Jews from German captivity, Bernadotte's insistence on a peaceful resolution to the conflict in Palestine sealed his fate with the Jewish extremists.  On September 17, 1948, Folke Bernadotte was assassinated while on a UN fact-finding mission when his car was ambushed with machine gun fire by agents of the Zionist terror group Lehi, aka the Stern Gang.  The murder was organized by future Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir.  On account of his peace proposals for Palestine, Bernadotte was considered 'a serious threat to the emerging state of Israel.'  Therefore, his status as rodef sealed his fate.

Rabin the Rodef

In 2004, Avigdor Neventzal, the Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, stated: "It should be known that anyone who wants to give away Israeli land is like a rodef, and certainly land should not be given to non-Jews.  Anyone ceding parts of the Land of Israel to gentiles is, from a halakhic point of view, subject to din rodef."

It's possible that Rabbi Neventzal had the murder of former Israeli Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin in mind when he made his thinly veiled homicidal declaration.

Rabin signed the Oslo Accords in 1993 as part of a United Nations process of establishing peace between the Israelis and Palestinians.  This move outraged many Jews of the Israeli state who felt that Rabin had betrayed them.  Seeking to fulfill the "rights of the Palestinian people to self-determination," the Accords established a governing body called the 'Palestinian Authority' which had rights to self-governance in parts of the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.  In addition, they acknowledged the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) as Israel's partner in various negotiations relating to border disputes, Israeli settlements, the status of Jerusalem, Israel's military presence in and control over remaining territories after Israel's recognition of Palestinian autonomy, and the Palestinian right of return.

On November 4, 1995, Rabin was murdered when he was shot twice by a Talmudic law student named Yigal Amir.  By "ceding parts of the Land of Israel to gentiles," Rabin had earned the rodef designation and would be made to pay with his life.  The New York Times of November 27, 1995 admits as much by quoting Amir's own reasoning for the assassination: "According to Jewish law, the minute a Jew betrays his people and country to the enemy, he must be killed.  No one taught me that law.  I've been studying the Talmud all my life, and I have all the data." (My emphasis)

Rachel the Rodef

"The dispensation applies even when the pursuer is not threatening to kill directly, but only indirectly...Therefore, any citizen of the state that opposes us - who encourages the armed fighters against us or expresses satisfaction over their actions, is considered a pursuer and may be killed.  Also, anyone who weakens our own state by word or similar action is considered a pursuer."- Rabbis Yitzhak Shapira and Yaakov Yosef, Torat Hamelech, (2009).

The Talmudic injunction of din rodef has decided the fate of many activists, political leaders, and journalists around the world who have run afoul of 'the Jews' in one way or another. [6]

One such person was a 23 year-old American woman named Rachel Corrie.

On Mach 16, 2003, Rachel was at the Rafah refugee camp in occupied Palestine protesting the destruction of Palestinian homes by the Israeli military.  Such audacity shown by a Gentile woman (Sanhedrin 81b - 82a) is more than sufficient, one might think, to earn the designation of rodef and be killed with impunity.  Whether or not this thought crossed her killer's mind, it is precisely what happened next when Rachel was repeatedly run over by a Caterpillar D9 bulldozer operated by a soldier of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF).  An eyewitness named Richard Pursell would later describe the event: "She was standing on top of a pile of earth.  The driver cannot have failed to see her.  As the blade pushed the pile, the earth rose up.  Rachel slid down the pile.  It looked as if her foot got caught.  The driver didn't slow down, he just ran her over.  Then he reversed the bulldozer back over her again."

In 2012, an Israeli court exonerated the military and ruled that what had happened was an accident for which Rachel herself was responsible.  Predictably, the American government remained silent and chose not to make an issue out of the cold-blooded murder.  One U.S. representative did try to pass a resolution calling for a thorough and transparent investigation into Rachel's murder, but Congress failed to take action on it.  Apparently they were more concerned with ensuring AIPAC dollars continued to flow into their coffers than they were with holding Israel accountable for the murder of a U.S. citizen.  The 'eternally outraged' Western media ignored the story and to this day most Americans remain oblivious to Rachel Corrie's fate.  Her apparent status as a rodef had rendered her liable for execution.

Din Rodef and Abortion

"It is tragic but demonstrably true that most of the leaders of the pro-abortion movement are of Jewish extraction." - Dr. Kenneth Mitzner

The designation of din rodef isn't only applied to those who seek to harm Jews physically, but can arbitrarily be applied to anyone for just about any reason, including to 'justify' abortion by claiming that the baby is pursuing its mother: 

"(A) central concept in Judaism is a 'rodef.'  The idea is that it's okay to defend yourself if you are threatened.  A rodef literally means 'pursuer.'  For rabbis who feel it would be okay to terminate a pregnancy, it's seeing the fetus as a pursuer...' - Sandy Falk, MD and Rabbi Daniel Judson "For Jews, Pregnancy has Unique Issues" Boston Globe, (Jan. 17, 2004)

Over the last few years we have seen restrictions on late-term abortion lifted in certain U.S. states.  To most sane people, this cosmic sin constitutes murder and is an affront to Western morality.  However, our laws are increasingly not being made by Western men endowed with Christian morals, but by an alien element that holds very different views on matters of human rights, life and death.

In the Bible, God recognizes the unborn child "as a being before the child had even been formed in the womb." (Jeremiah 1:5)  How can we reconcile this distinctly Christian teaching with the laws being passed in America and Europe today?  We can't.  And so it's obvious that our laws are being influenced by a radically different ideology.  What does the Talmud say about the rights of an unborn child?  According to renowned Jewish legal scholar, Rabbi Isaac Schorr, "The sense of the Talmud is that a fetus is not a person."  Rabbi Meir Abulafia agrees, saying "So long as a fetus is inside the womb, it is not a nefesh, and the Torah has no pity on it."  (It's evident here that Rabbi Abulafia is referring to the Talmud when he says 'Torah.')  

Understanding the Talmudic mentality concerning the rights (or lack thereof) of the unborn child, helps us appreciate why so many Jews have been at the forefront of the abortion movement in America and Europe.  Abortion has never been about 'women's liberation.'  It has always been a weapon deployed to destroy the very cornerstone of Western civilization, i.e. the nuclear family.  These are not just my words, they are the words of Simone Veil, a Jewess former health minister of France who established abortion on demand.  Veil reportedly once told a Paris news conference: "We are out to destroy the family.  The best way to do that is to begin by attacking its weakest member, the unborn child." [7]  Since the extra-judicial murder of a rodef is considered a mitzvah (divine deed), no humanitarian concerns enter the equation when an unborn child is so designated.

Coronavirus Micromanagement

"...the philosophy of the Hebrews must be inquired into, their Mishnah, their Gemara, Cabbala, Jezirah, Soha, Cosri, and their Talmud...What a wretched depravity of sentiment and manners must have prevailed, before such corrupt maxims could have obtained credit.  It was the reformation of this 'wretched depravity' of morals which Jesus undertook." - Thomas Jefferson, letter to John Adams, Oct. 13, 1813, in The Writings of Thomas Jefferson, (Washington D.C: Taylor and Murray, 1854) vol. 6, p. 218

One of the most striking characteristics of the Talmud is the suffocating micromanagement it prescribes for its adherents.  Thousands of pathological mandates are put forth which govern the lives of the Orthodox down to the most minute detail. (Consider for instance, the Seven Clean Days ritual governing a woman's menstruation period, or the requirement for women to remove every speck of chametz from their home during the eight days of Passover. The same obsessive psychology abounds in our COVID 'era of insanity.')  These are the 'heavy burdens' placed upon the people of ancient Israel by the Pharisees, for which Jesus called them to account. (Luke 11:46)

Not much has changed in two thousand years, only now these 'heavy burdens' are borne by the entire world.

Talmudic-style micromanagement has been imposed on the people en masse by the governments of the world in the wake of the COVID-19 'pandemic.'  Every nonsensical mask mandate, social distancing ordinance or curfew that flagrantly defies science and insults commonsense could have come straight from the sordid pages of the Talmud. [8]  Even the obsession with ritual handwashing, so topical of late, is a part of the Pharisaic tradition that Jesus condemned. (Mark 7)

Jesus Christ set us free from these oppressive Talmudic burdens.  America's Declaration of Independence and U.S. Constitution were written by men whose minds were steeped in the freedom of the Gospel.  So too was the Magna Carta.  As Judaic supremacy has gained an ever-stronger foothold in the last century, we have seen the steady erosion of Western democratic ideals.  Entering into the void has been a distinctly foreign system which places no emphasis on truth, free speech, human rights or the divine status of man as an image-bearer of God.  The result has been the construction of a two-tier police state in the formerly free and democratic West, whereby the rights of the weak pale in comparison to those of the powerful.  This is the Talmudic system of the rabbinic anti-Christs, whose undue influence over world affairs is leading to our collective suicide. [9]

*Read my debut book 'Perfidy of Zion' to learn much more. Copies can be obtained by emailing me at PerfidyofZionbook@gmail.com*

Notes:

1. According to Rabbi Shimon ben Yohai: "He who occupies himself with Scripture gains merit that is no merit.  He who occupies himself with Mishnah gains merit for which people receive a reward.  He who occupies himself with Talmud -- there is no source of merit greater than this." (Baba Metzia 33A)

2. According to Dov Zakheim, Under Secretary of Defense during the George W. Bush Administration: "It is the consensus of many halachic decisors that the yefat to'ar (female goy battle captive) can be subject to involuntary intercourse, though only once, after which she must undergo a specific regimen described in the Torah, conversion and marriage, before her captor is permitted further sexual relations with her..." -- Dov Zakheim, Meorot vol. 6 (2006) p. 5                                                                             

Eyal Karim, the Chief Rabbi of the Israeli Army, has also voiced the same opinion regarding the legality of raping non-Jewish women during wartime.                                                                          

cf. Hoffman, Michael A., Revisionist History newsletter no.111

3. Few examples better illustrate this fact than Secretary of State Madeline Albright's infamous appearance on 60 Minutes, during which she told reporter Lesley Stahl that the death of half a million Iraqi children due to her administration's sanctions was "worth it" to punish Saddam Hussein.  Albright was a Jew by race but not religion (allegedly), yet her complete disregard for non-Jewish life falls right in line with Talmudic teachings.  Suggesting a racial explanation for this phenomena, Alfred Rosenberg once wrote, "the Talmud didn't create the Jew, but rather the Jew the Talmud."

4. Advancing the cause of International Jewry is always paramount to these people.  Seemingly contradictory worldviews like secular/religious or communist/capitalist often align to march in unified formation with this purpose in mind.  This is why throughout history Jewish capitalists like Jacob Schiff, Paul Warburg, George Soros, et al., have allocated huge sums of money to communist revolutionaries.  It also explains why an ardent Zionist like the criminal Marc Rich provided funds for the Arab terrorist Abu Nidal, despite being close personal friends with Israeli prime ministers Ehud Barak, Shimon Peres and Ehud Olmert.  Oftentimes terrorism against Israel is desired by the Zionists themselves as a means of achieving political goals (like when Ariel Sharon launched the invasion of Lebanon in 1982 using an attack on an Israeli diplomat by a Palestinian as his justification).  If the requisite terrorism doesn't exist organically, they will create it.

5. Deir Yassin was a peaceful Palestinian village of 600 civilians that wanted nothing to do with the 1948 war. Nevertheless, the Jewish terror group Irgun, led by Menachem Begin, invaded the village and unleashed a ruthless campaign of terror resulting in 254 deaths, many of which were women and children.  Zvi Ankori, who commanded the Haganah unit that controlled Deir Yassin, said: "I went in to six or seven houses. I saw cut off genitalia and women's crushed stomachs. According to the shooting signs on the bodies, it was direct murder."  Colonel Meir Pa'el, another Haganah officer said: "The Irgun and LEHI men came out of hiding and began to 'clean' the houses. They shot whoever they saw, women and children included, the commanders did not try and stop the massacre..."  It's hard to believe such barbarism could be inflicted by Jews just three years after the liberation of Auschwitz, if we are to believe Auschwitz was the 'factory of death' Jews claim it was.  Apparently the slogan 'Never Again' had a shockingly short shelf life and should perhaps be revised to 'Not for Three Years.'

6. There are Jewish fingerprints all over the assassination of John F. Kennedy, and numerous researchers have pointed to Meyer Lansky, Tibor Rosenbaum, Louis Bloomfield, Yitzhak Shamir and, of course, Jack Ruby aka Jacob Rubenstein, as having played significant roles.  The late, great journalist, Michael Collins Piper, asserted that it was American Jews in conjunction with Israelis who were mainly responsible for Kennedy's death, and pointed out that New Orleans District Attorney Jim Garrison, inadvertently stumbled onto the Rothschild link in the assassination during his prosecution of Clay Shaw.  Both Shaw and Louis Bloomfield sat on the board of the shadowy Permindex organization that Garrison was investigating (Bloomfield was its chief executive and largest shareholder).  Bloomfield was also a longtime attorney for, and business partner of, the Rothschilds -- in particular Baron Edmund de Rothschild -- and he provided material support for Israel's nuclear bomb program.  It is known that Kennedy had run afoul of 'the Jews' after vocally denouncing Israel's illegal nuclear program and ordering routine inspections of its facilities in Dimona.  Bloomfield stated that the "guiding genius" behind Permindex was a Romanian Jew named George Mandel, who he described as a "33rd degree Mason with the closest connections in the highest diplomatic circles." In a 2013 article for American Free Press, Piper wrote, "All told, a variety of evidence indicates Permindex fronted for a Mossad operation funding Israel's drive to assemble the atomic bomb.  A primary Permindex shareholder and the chief depository for its funds - the Banque De Credit Internationale [BCI] of Geneva - was the fiefdom of Tibor Rosenbaum, a Mossad arms procurement official referred to as one of Israel's 'founding fathers.'  BCI was also chief money launderer for the crime syndicate of Israeli loyalist Meyer Lansky, business partner of...Sam Bronfman, associate of Louis Bloomfield and the Rothschilds."  Another Jew involved in the cover up was the future senator from Pennsylvania, Arlen Spector, whose ridiculous magic bullet theory was adopted by the Warren Commission despite its obvious impossibility.  Michael Piper's book Final Judgement is a must-read.

7. Bernard Nathanson and Lawrence Lader were the men who did more than anyone to make abortion legal in America.  Both were Jews.  Nathanson gained widespread prominence as a founding member of the National Association for the Repeal of Abortion Laws (known currently as NARAL Pro-Choice America).  He worked closely with feminist Betty Friedan (nee Goldstein) for the legalization of abortion and their efforts were finally successful with the decision in Roe v. Wade.  Nathanson would later convert to Catholicism and become an outspoken opponent of abortion.  Filled with remorse later in life he would say, "If it weren't for Jews we wouldn't have had legal abortion."

The following is excerpted from the book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit, (2008) by Catholic scholar E. Michael Jones.  It illustrates how pervasive 'the Jews' have been in legalizing infanticide in America:   

* All four original organizers of the most influential group of abortion pushers in the United States, the National Abortion Rights Action League (NARAL), were of Jewish birth, including now prolife Dr. Bernard Nathanson

* Dr. Christopher Tietze worked for the Population Institute and International Planned Parenthood Federation and did more to promote the worldwide slaughter of innocent unborn children than any other person.

* Dr. Alan Guttmacher was president of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America for more than a decade, founded Planned Parenthood Physicians, and did more than any other doctor to promote abortion in this country. He also advocated mandatory abortion and sterilization for certain groups in the United States.

* Dr. Etienne-Emile Baulieu, inventor of the RU-486 abortion pill, was born in 1926 to a physician named Leon Blum. He changed his name in 1942.

* Stanford professor Paul Ehrlich is the ''father'' of the overpopulation myth. His work, The Population Bomb, was the spark that ignited the anti-natalist movement.

*California and New York state legislators led the drive for legalized abortion in the United States. Legislators who constantly emphasized their Jewishness led the pro-abortion movement in both states; those leaders included state senators Anthony Beilenson in California and Albert Blumenthal in New York. [Anthony Beilenson drafted the abortion bill signed into law by Ronald Reagan.]

* Of the 41 Jewish-born members of the U.S. Senate over the last 20 years, 32 (or 80 percent) have been stridently pro-abortion.

* Pro-abortion "Jews" dominate such anti-life groups as the American Civil Liberties Union and People for the American Way.

* Numerous liberal Jewish groups openly support and advocate abortion, including the American Jewish Committee, the American Jewish Congress, the National Council of Jewish Women, Hadassah Women, the Federation of Reconstructionist Congregations, the Jewish Labor Committee, the Union of American Hebrew Congregations, B'nai B'rith Women, Naiamat USA, the National Federation of Temple Sisterhood, the New Jewish Agenda, North American Temple Youth, the United Synagogues of America, and the Women's League for Conservative Judaism. Many of these groups were founded for the express purpose of pushing abortion.

8. Talmud tractate Bava Metzia 59b states "The distance that one must maintain from an ostracized individual is four cubits."  Four cubits equals exactly six feet.  Where else do we see that mandate enforced today?

9. For those who wish to learn more about these topics, I highly recommend the work of scholar Michael A. Hoffman.  His books and newsletters are indispensable research materials.