The Perpetual Pandemic

A Pandemic of Cases

In 2009, just prior to the ‘Swine Flu’ outbreak, the World Health Organization (WHO) changed the definition of what constitutes a pandemic by eliminating “enormous numbers of deaths and illnesses” as a necessary criteria. Since then, as we’ve seen, a “pandemic” can be declared solely on numbers of cases. [1]

What we have experienced these past two years is in no way a pandemic under the traditional definition of the word. Instead, we have been treated to a pandemic of cases made possible by notoriously faulty tests — with the Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) being the most widely used. [2]

The PCR test was created by Dr. Kary Mullis who won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 1993 for its invention. Mullis himself would say that PCR should never be used to diagnose infectious disease because it can easily be manipulated to “find anything in anyone.” He went on to say, “It [the PCR test] doesn’t tell you that you’re sick and doesn’t tell you that the thing you ended up with was really going to hurt you…” (Though Kary Mullis died in August 2019, his assessment of the test’s shortcomings was proven to be true in August 2021, when the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) admitted it was incapable of distinguishing COVID from other viral illnesses.)

According to Mullis, what PCR was originally designed to do is take bits of genetic material found inside the body and amplify the sample collected so it could be analyzed for purposes of research. It was never intended to be used as a test for infectious disease simply because by amplifying the sample with higher cycle thresholds (CT), the likelihood of false positives is off the charts. And that’s exactly what has happened. [3]

Beyond the Threshold

It is widely understood that running a PCR test at 35 CT or higher will not yield accurate results because at that point the sample has been amplified to such an extent that the test is just picking up dead virus matter or inconsequential genetic fragments and reporting it as a positive test. For this reason Dr. Mullis said that “PCR is…just a process that’s used to make a whole lot of something out of something.”

A September 28, 2020 study in Clinical Infectious Diseases, explained that when a PCR test is run at a cycle threshold (CT) of 35 or higher, the accuracy falls to just 3%! Even the slimy swamp-dwelling eel, Anthony Fauci, admitted during a radio interview that the chances of getting an accurate PCR reading over 35 CT “are miniscule” because at these levels a positive result is “just dead nucleotides, period.”

Yet up until just recently the CDC and FDA recommended running PCR at 40 CT and the WHO recommended running it at 45 CT! This made it possible for the WHO to declare a global ‘pandemic’ under the new contrived definition of the term.

This continued throughout 2020, as the amplification rates of the tests were deliberately run sky high so as to create the cases necessary to justify lockdowns and the deletion of human freedom. However, once the ‘vaccines’ arrived, the cycle thresholds were suddenly lowered to give the appearance that the jabs were working.

On January 20, 2021, after discussions with the CDC, the World Health Organization recommended that laboratories lower their testing amplification rates. Health writer Dr. David Samadi, commented that the WHO had made its decision because the previously high cycle thresholds were “resulting in any particle being declared a positive case” and reports in the media began pointing out that case numbers may have been ‘dramatically inflated.’

In April of 2021, with the ‘vaccine’ rollout in full swing, the CDC issued new guidance to laboratories in America to run PCR at 28 cycles, but only for vaccinated individuals! Unvaccinated samples were to continue being run at 40 CT or more, and so the likelihood of unvaccinated people testing positive compared with those who’ve taken the jab is intentionally designed to be disproportionate.

Illustrating the ruse, a lab in Massachusetts found that 85% – 90% of people who tested positive before the cycle threshold was lowered would now produce a negative result at 30 CT. Ashish Jha, MD director of the Harvard Global Health Institute, said: “I’m really shocked that it could be that high…Boy, does it really change the way we need to be thinking about testing.” It sure does. This manner of manipulation and deceit has provided the ‘justification’ for destroying our world. Not exactly a small issue. [4]

Died of ‘COVID’?

“The ‘Covid Pandemic’ was the creation of the PCR test run at high cycles designed to produce high rates of false positives. This allowed the medical establishment to designate almost all deaths from cancer, heart attack, etc. as “Covid deaths” if the patients were given the orchestrated PCR test run at cycles known to produce false positives. A person who died with a false positive was counted as a Covid death.” — Paul Craig Roberts, fmr. Asst. Secretary of the Treasury and Associate Editor of the Wall Street Journal.

In the spring of 2020, after what we were told was an unthinkably lethal COVID outbreak, Italian authorities revealed that 99% of those alleged to have died from COVID in Italy actually had multiple co-morbidities which alone could have been responsible for their deaths. [5] A little while later the CDC published a similar figure for America, claiming only 6% of COVID deaths occurred in fully healthy individuals, while the other 94% had an average of 3.8 potentially fatal co-morbidities. Clearly something fishy was going on and it had to do with the fraudulent manner in which ‘COVID deaths’ were being recorded. One example of this was if someone died from anything within 28 days of a positive test (in some countries it was 60 days), doctors were instructed to list the cause of death as ‘COVID.’

Dr. Scott Jensen, a medical doctor and former Minnesota state senator, said he was sent a seven-page document by the U.S. Department of Health ‘coaching’ him on the new way to fill out death certificates. He said that doctors were ‘encouraged, if not pressured’ into listing COVID as the cause of death — even in the absence of a positive test — if the person had any of the endless symptoms assigned to ‘COVID’ (runny nose, itchy eyes, common cold, etc.).

Illinois Public Health Director, Dr. Ngozi Ezike, revealed the mendacity at a news conference when she said, “If you were in hospice and given a few weeks to live and you were then found to have COVID, that would be counted as a COVID death. [There might be] a clear alternative cause, but it’s still listed as a COVID death. So everyone listed as a COVID death doesn’t mean that was the cause of death, but that they had COVID at the time of death.”

Is it any surprise we have repeatedly seen victims of gunshot wounds, auto accidents and terminal illnesses being counted as ‘COVID deaths’?

Long Planned

“Some even believe we are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure — one world if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and proud of it.” — David Rockefeller, Memoirs, (2002) p. 405

None of this is happening by random chance. The destruction of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for billions of people has all been coldly calculated at the highest levels by forces that seek to own the entirety of Earth’s natural resources and material wealth. The trail of the perps can be traced back many years, but for obvious space constraints I will pick up the story with a document published just over a decade ago.

In 2010, the Rockefeller Foundation produced a report titled ‘Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.’ The elite Rockefeller family has been working for many years towards the establishment of a World Government and have been instrumental in founding organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations, World Health Organization and the Trilateral Group, which all work tirelessly towards that goal. [6]

In the 2010 document, the Rockefeller Foundation ‘imagined’ the outbreak of an influenza virus and detailed the global response that would involve destruction of economies, closed shops and businesses, mandated face masks and temperature checks to enter communal spaces. The document said:

“During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions, from the mandatory wearing of face masks to body temperature checks at the entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets. Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified. In order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems…leaders around the world took a firmer grip on power.

At first, the notion of a more controlled world gained wide acceptance and approval. Citizens willingly gave up some of their sovereignty — and their privacy — to more paternalistic states in exchange for greater safety and stability. Citizens were more tolerant, and even eager, for top-down direction and oversight, and national leaders had more latitude to impose order in ways they saw fit.

In developed countries, this heightened oversight took many forms: biometric IDs for all citizens, for example, and tighter regulation of key industries whose stability was deemed vital to national interests. In many developed countries, enforced cooperation with a suite of new regulations and agreements slowly but steadily restored both order and, importantly, economic growth.”

This prescient document also foretold the role China would play in setting the example for world-wide lockdowns: “However, a few countries did fare better — China in particular. The Chinese government’s quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near-hermetic sealing off of all borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.”

All of this has obviously come to pass.

The reason there was such global uniformity in the implementation of draconian and unscientific ‘health measures’ is because this event has been long-planned and centrally coordinated by the global elite who operate without consideration for national borders.

Another proof of this was an October, 2019 pandemic ‘simulation’ called Event 201, which involved the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, the WHO and CDC, Johns Hopkins University, United Nations, Johnson & Johnson, and officials from China and the international banking system.

Event 201 centered around a coronavirus outbreak and game-planned government response strategies including lockdowns, censorship of alternative information and social media posts critical of the ‘pandemic,’ and the creation and mass distribution of a vaccine. Every participant in the Event 201 ‘simulation’ would go on to play integral roles in the unfolding drama only a couple short months later. If anyone still believes this to be a coincidence after all we’ve been through, they are bereft of mind.

And so friends, as we hurtle past year two of ’15 days to flatten the curve’ I would like you to stop for a moment and think about the extraordinary lies we have been told every step of this journey by people in positions of power. It does no good to continue ‘trusting the experts’ that have already guided us down the paths of social and economic devastation, and who, if left unchecked, will destroy every vestige of freedom we have left. Nor can we comply our way out of this situation. What is needed now is massive non-cooperation. We must simply refuse to cooperate with a system that seeks to enslave us and our future generations by obliterating the freedoms that once made this country a light unto the world. Stand your ground. Resist. Don’t ever capitulate to tyranny.

Notes:

1.) In November 2020, the WHO changed the time-honored definition of herd immunity by excising “immunity developed through previous infection.” The updated definition refers only to obtaining a certain vaccination threshold as a means for achieving herd immunity. Speaking of vaccines, the WHO also changed the definition of ‘vaccine’ from “a product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease” to “a preparation that is used to stimulate the body’s immune response against diseases.” This subtle but important change was done to account for the COVID mRNA shots not actually providing immunity from contracting or transmitting ‘the virus.’

2.) PCR isn’t the only test that churns out a majority of false positives. In an email leaked to the press dated April 9, 2021, Ben Dyson, Executive Director of Strategy at UK Department of Health and an advisor to UK Health Secretary Matt Hancock, estimated that the lateral flow rapid test has at best a 25% chance of being accurate, and could be as low as 2%. This is the same test widely used in schools and businesses.

3.) In August 2021, the CDC admitted that PCR can’t distinguish between ‘COVID’ and other viral illnesses.

4.) A person is not considered fully vaccinated until 14 days after their second dose of the Pfizer or Moderna shots or their first dose of J&J. This means that if someone has an adverse reaction and dies after taking the first jab or within 14 days of taking the second one, it goes on the books as an ‘unvaccinated death, oftentimes with the cause being listed as ‘Covid-19.’

5.) In November 2021, the Italian Institute of Health quietly revised the COVID death-toll from 130,468 to just 3,783. Despite such a drastic reduction by a country that was used to generate the initial panic necessary to justify lockdowns in the West, the media in America has been completely silent on the change.

6.) The large piece of land in New York upon which the UN Headquarters building sits was donated by the Rockefeller family. The UN is a ‘stalking horse’ for World Government.